Immigration is not an issue to 140 characters.

Nor it is payable as an opportunity for Italians without taking into account the difficulties and obstacles that integration implies for our country.
Without rhetoric.
What do we gain or lose from the arrival of migratory flows, their management, from their social absorption?
To answer we start with some points.
The first it was put repeatedly highlighted by analysts but mostly by the daily news: you can manage arrivals of refugees and people fleeing from war, famine, drought to Europe, but it is impossible to stop them altogether.
This means that the option of contenimentoa their home is not only unrealistic but impossible in the medium term because the flows are triggered by political instability, economic and social outside the sovereignty and European influence.
This does not mean that it is unnecessary to adopt supportive policies to tackle the phenomenon, but these policies must be adopted simultaneously in both countries of destination and in the countries of departure.
With this in mind the famous "let's help at home", as vulgar, it has a single logical foothold: to demonstrate that economic growth and stability in a different way by our decreasing emigration from that same territory.
Referring to the analysis of Emilio Sacerdoti of Lavoce.info, it has shown that, at least in sub- Saharan Africa, a surge in domestic prosperity combined with democratic politics corresponds to a decrease of leaks abroad.
Priests writes: "In the period 2013-15 seven African countries recorded growth rates of over 6 per cent [...] The sustained growth reduces migration (such as Rwanda, Tanzania, Mozambique, Ivory Coast).
But it is essential that the political situation will promote stability and inclusion: the repressive policies in Ethiopia, Eritrea and the Gambia until recently have stimulated emigration, despite improvements in the economy. "
They say the data but it is a conclusion that perhaps does not deserve even analysis: it goes without saying that when peace and riches characterize the national development, the dispersion of citizens become only a remote hypothesis.
Now, if these conditions can not be guaranteed the only alternative is to understand how to accommodate the thousands of migrants who reach our shores.
We come to Italy.
The second point is indisputable that yes, our country by geographical location is among the European countries where most migrants arrive.
They say the UNCHR statistics (here is the updated data can be monitored).
The latest estimates updated to July 12, 2017 report more than 102,000 arrivals of which more than 86 thousand only in our country.
There is a transition period between arrivals and the possibility that these people are integrated in the Italian context, you want to cultural work.
But the benefit from an integration is greater than any cost should be supported for the reception.
Already in 2012 the Bank of Italy showed in its cyclical studies on the impact of immigration in our country, that foreign people had no negative impact on the market in work, the economy and the welfare of the Peninsula estate.
This conclusion is still valid today.
But bringing it to be explained in the Italian context.
We start a pension.
The president of INPS, Tito Boeri, is now famous for its interventions counter-information on the issue "but immigrants they catch our pensions and Campania with our money."
The INPS data - available here estimated at 5 billion a year the positive impact of the contributions of foreigners to Italian speakers: meaning, that is, 5 billion euro of Italian pensions are guaranteed annually by foreigners payments without Italian citizenship.
In the face of this figure immigrants perceive to their own pensions 3 billion euro, with a negative balance - for them - about 2 billion euro.
Over 60% of pensions paid by immigrants - according to the INPS data - is a non-contributory direct, but the expense is always lower than the contribution of the share of immigrants who instead pays INPS and it is balanced greatly by gettiti on entrepreneurial activities that, on balance, contributions by foreign immigrants in Italy reach an altitude of 11 billion.
If you look at the data on jobs and productivity these numbers grow, for once again the Italian GDP.
They always say that the official reports.
Immigrants in fact, are the most resistant to the crisis entrepreneurs: there are approximately 550,000 companies led by EU citizens extras that generate an added value of over 95 billion euro.
Istati According to statistics, in the first quarter of 2017 foreigners working are 2 million 387 thousand.
Of these, more than two thirds have only middle school or high school diploma and then performs unskilled jobs from the title point of view.
On this point it should be noted the experience of central Fenoglio reception of Settimo Torinese (Province of Turin) that has become a real hub of excellence for the management of arrivals, training and integration of foreigners in the social context flag but above the concrete answer to "immigrants steal our jobs".
The 80% of people leaving the center located occupation.
But managers dampen the reactions of those who claim that it is subtracted jobs Italians with incontrovertible data and that could be summarized as: are the Italian companies who come to the center to ask people to be employed because the supply of seats Italians It goes systematically vacuum.
What we talk about jobs?
For example do the 'operaiosu an oil rig, for months away from home.
As examples so there are an infinite number.
And the conclusion is always the same: this population carries out duties that we do not want to do more because we consider harsh, degrading and not suited to our way of studies.
End of controversy.
Another point: the burden of immigrants on welfare services and support our own.
Here the assumption is that the more foreigners arrive, they will be worse our coffers.
Here's what the data say: Italian municipalities spend (reference year 2013) over 200 million euro per year in delivery of services and benefits for all Italians (net of contributions to the National Health Service).
For immigrants, the fee is 43 million Euros, so not even one quarter of the total.
More than the benefits, proven, immigration on the economy and welfare should focus on waste and dysfunction created by the mismanagement of shelters and generally very little from economic effort that the Italian Governments invest in the Chapter Immigration: we spend just 15 billion l 'year to welcome and integrate, and yet we have guaranteed pensions covered tasks and jobs.
Help them to their home?
Immigrant, the video in which Zalone proves good but especially clever

From Wired